Which RAML representation is valid for the given XML example?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Study for the MuleSoft Associate / Development Fundamental Test. Master key concepts with flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Prepare thoroughly for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which RAML representation is valid for the given XML example?

Explanation:
RAML uses YAML syntax, so the mapping must reflect the XML structure with exact key names and a proper representation for multiple items. The collection value should be the exact text from the XML, and the list of artists should be expressed as a sequence of mappings, not as repeated keys under the same mapping. The correct form expresses the music container with a single collection key and a list (array) for the artists. For example: music: { collection: Classic Rock, artists: [ { artist: Deep Purple }, { artist: Rainbow } ] }. Expanding it in more readable YAML looks like: music: collection: Classic Rock artists: - artist: Deep Purple - artist: Rainbow. This mirrors the XML structure: one collection value and multiple artist entries. Options that duplicate the same key under artists or that use an incorrect case for the collection name violate YAML/RAML conventions or don’t faithfully reflect the XML structure. The valid RAML form is the one that uses the exact collection key and a proper list under artists.

RAML uses YAML syntax, so the mapping must reflect the XML structure with exact key names and a proper representation for multiple items. The collection value should be the exact text from the XML, and the list of artists should be expressed as a sequence of mappings, not as repeated keys under the same mapping.

The correct form expresses the music container with a single collection key and a list (array) for the artists. For example: music: { collection: Classic Rock, artists: [ { artist: Deep Purple }, { artist: Rainbow } ] }. Expanding it in more readable YAML looks like: music: collection: Classic Rock artists: - artist: Deep Purple - artist: Rainbow. This mirrors the XML structure: one collection value and multiple artist entries.

Options that duplicate the same key under artists or that use an incorrect case for the collection name violate YAML/RAML conventions or don’t faithfully reflect the XML structure. The valid RAML form is the one that uses the exact collection key and a proper list under artists.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy